Follow-up on the previous part - this time with DX8 and DX9 hardware. If you are instered in this era of GPUs, you are in the right place. Radeon 9700 Pro, GeForce FX 5800 Ultra and many others, everything thoroughly tested.
Introduction
Let's make this short :) This is part 2 of the huge benchmark project that started in 2012. More details about history of the project can be found in the previous article.
So here we are - part 2. This time we start with DX8 hardware - GeForce3 and Radeon 8500 are the oldest ones (and unfortunately for them also tle worst performing). Then we get to GeForce4 Ti
and of course the famour Radeon 9000 family, including the Radeon 9700 Pro and 9800 XT. GeForce FX must be present here as well. Many years ago, I was lucky to get the original leaf blower, errr... I mean
GeForce FX 5800 Ultra. :) Fortunately it is still in working order and completed the benchmark suite without issues.
Radeon X800 cards were popular back in the day. GeForce 6 series were also very good, so most
of them are present in this test. Originally, this article was supposed to end with Radeon X800 XT PE and GeForce 6800 Utra. Later I decided to extend it slightly and add a few selected GPUs of the next generation
and see how they compare to older flagships. Among the added cards are Radeon X1300, X1600 X1800 and from the green camp GeForce 7300 and 7800 series.
There are also a few special pieces here. Matrox Parhelia was supposed to compete with GeForce4 Ti series or even later Radeon 9500/9700. Unfortunately because of several reasons it failed and Matrox stopped
further development of gaming hardware.
S3 wasn't very active after the Savage 2000 debacle. But eventually they managed to get back to the GPUs market and come up with some interesting videocards. They are unfortunately quite rare and hard to get.
Still, a working Chrome S25 ended up in my hands - and it present in this test. :)
As the last addition, there are couple of lowend cards several generations younger. They are cut-down enough not to cause power creep, but still interesting to see how they perform. The most notable one is probably
GeForce GT 610 PCI. This is the very last card made for the original PCI bus (non-express). This card is very picky about motherboard and chipset it runs on. Unfortunately VIA PT880 Ultra is not on the compatible list.
Therefore I used older SiS 651 board with Pentium 4 processor to benchmark it. There might be some CPU bottlenecks, but I suspect most of the time PCI bus limits the card and using better platform wouldn't do much good in this case.
Test System - Hardware
The test system was chosen to provide the best possible performance for AGP cards. ASRock 4CoreDual-SATA2 with overclocked Pentium E5700 should be more than enough. As a side effect, PCI-E cards can be tested on this system
as well, albeit with slightly reduced performance (only 4 PCI-E lanes and slightly slower CPU). The CPU has BSEL mod applied to report FSB 266 (1066) as default. This allows memory divider 1:1 to be used
and increases memory performance greatly.
Apparently, the PT880 Ultra chipset is unstable at FSB > 266 MHz if PCI-E GPU is used. Also this board for some reason doesn't allow "half" multipliers. Therefore
For PCI-E, 14×266 was used as a closest possible frequency. I had no idea about this before I already had most AGP cards finished and I really didn't feel like rebenching them.